INTERFERENCE.COM
U2 Fans, 'Zine, and More

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Your Blue Room > Everything You Know Is Wrong > Where The Album Has No Name




Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-01-2009, 07:09 PM   #1
Sizzlin' Sicilian
Forum Administrator
 
Sicy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: runnin' down the road like loose electricity
Posts: 62,540
Local Time: 02:17 PM
Songs of Ascent - Part III

Continue discussing (not arguing) here.

Previous thread:
Songs of Ascent - Part II

For the people that are out of the loop, if someone could post links or any other information about when and if this album is coming out, that would be helpful.



__________________
sicy[at]interference.com
Sicy is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:14 PM   #2
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
powerhour24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,057
Local Time: 05:17 PM
As per the comment that they should write about sex and drugs?? Um, 1 grow up, and 2, remember what band we're discussing. Aside from the songs about other people's addictions, what does U2 have to do with drugs? And this sounds even more spiritual than NLOTH, the cleanness and spirituality are both parts of their appeal to me.


powerhour24 is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:16 PM   #3
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Probably in a commieblock
Posts: 9,497
Local Time: 07:47 AM
The whole "I want to get singles on the pop charts" thing is starting to worry me, and has dampened my spirits a little bit.


Vlad n U 2 is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:24 PM   #4
Rock n' Roll Doggie
ALL ACCESS
 
digitize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 7,514
Local Time: 04:17 PM
Regarding the sex/drugs thing, I thought the original poster was talking about them writing about sex and drugs in a Guns-N-Roses-type way. If they want to make more songs like MOS and Bad, I fully condone it (MOS and Bad are two of my five favorite U2 songs).


digitize is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:27 PM   #5
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Probably in a commieblock
Posts: 9,497
Local Time: 07:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitize View Post
Regarding the sex/drugs thing, I thought the original poster was talking about them writing about sex and drugs in a Guns-N-Roses-type way. If they want to make more songs like MOS and Bad, I fully condone it (MOS and Bad are two of my five favorite U2 songs).
I agree, even if U2 write songs related to these things, they make it seem vague and not at all sleazy.


Vlad n U 2 is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 07:58 PM   #6
Refugee
 
Gilead12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,135
Local Time: 09:17 PM
What we have to remember with the comment about hits it that U2 really believe in the power of a beautiful melody to rip through the consciousness of entire countries. It's not so much a matter of making a song commercial for them (no songs about chasing hot girls or getting high) as it is finding that melody that's just instantly unforgettable.

The intro to WOWY, the drums/guitar as SBS builds, the piano/guitar on BD... you hear that and you just KNOW it's major.

NLOTH had plenty of beautiful songs, but none of them had that instant classic feel. I'm not even saying it lacked U2 classics (heck, I think MOS, Magnificent, and arguably Breathe/UC/NLOTH/CT are all right there).

What the band means, I think, is not that they're going to go into the studio and scrap beautiful music until they have something that's pure pop. They just mean they want at least one of those songs that you never forget, one of those songs that becomes, by way of the pop consciousness, practically eternal.

U2 believe in an "If you build it, they will come" ethic. They really believe that if they can just find the right melody, the right beautiful chorus, the right sound, the whole world will sit up and listen.

So I don't let it worry me too much. These guys know what good music sounds like.


Gilead12 is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:03 PM   #7
Rock n' Roll Doggie
FOB
 
Vlad n U 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Probably in a commieblock
Posts: 9,497
Local Time: 07:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilead12 View Post
What we have to remember with the comment about hits it that U2 really believe in the power of a beautiful melody to rip through the consciousness of entire countries. It's not so much a matter of making a song commercial for them (no songs about chasing hot girls or getting high) as it is finding that melody that's just instantly unforgettable.

The intro to WOWY, the drums/guitar as SBS builds, the piano/guitar on BD... you hear that and you just KNOW it's major.

NLOTH had plenty of beautiful songs, but none of them had that instant classic feel. I'm not even saying it lacked U2 classics (heck, I think MOS, Magnificent, and arguably Breathe/UC/NLOTH/CT are all right there).

What the band means, I think, is not that they're going to go into the studio and scrap beautiful music until they have something that's pure pop. They just mean they want at least one of those songs that you never forget, one of those songs that becomes, by way of the pop consciousness, practically eternal.

U2 believe in an "If you build it, they will come" ethic. They really believe that if they can just find the right melody, the right beautiful chorus, the right sound, the whole world will sit up and listen.

So I don't let it worry me too much. These guys know what good music sounds like.
I like your theory, Gilead. But what would you think of the people that would simply scream "sell out" after this pure pop single is unleashed into the airwaves.


Vlad n U 2 is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:10 PM   #8
New Yorker
 
Aygo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 2,623
Local Time: 09:17 PM
1) Loved the assumption that NLOTH was well received by the overall public/critics, but not commercially as much as hoped, specially on the singles' impact.

2) I looooooved Bono's intervention about his reaction to people's dumbness about him and the band and the analogy of rock band/politicians. Perfect.

3) Didn't like the desperation for an hit single. They want a moody, slower (maybe even more atmospheric) album. How do they want to put it on the radios if that's the extreme opposite of what radios are looking for these days? How are they gonna make it? Put some sort of GOYB (which I love) in the middle of more paced-down songs like NLOTH?

4) Glad to see the will of releasing SOA ASAP. I think that this time we have too many indicators that there's another album coming soon, unlike in the past.


Aygo is offline  
Old 10-01-2009, 08:48 PM   #9
Refugee
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,402
Local Time: 09:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerhour24 View Post
As per the comment that they should write about sex and drugs?? Um, 1 grow up, and 2, remember what band we're discussing. Aside from the songs about other people's addictions, what does U2 have to do with drugs? And this sounds even more spiritual than NLOTH, the cleanness and spirituality are both parts of their appeal to me.
I was that original poster.

1) What is so immature about writing about sex and drugs if they're done in an artistic manner? Leonard Cohen's "Hallelujah" is about an orgasm for crying out loud.

2) What does U2 have to do with sex and drugs? Okay, for starters: Bad, Running To Stand Still, Wire, MOS, Discoteque, Do You Feel Loved, If You Wear That Velvet Dress, Deep In The Heart, The Unforgettable Fire, Hawkmoon, Desire, Even Better Than The Real Thing, So Cruel, Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses, Elevation, Daddy's Gonna Pay For Your Crashed Car...


ozeeko is offline  
Old 10-02-2009, 01:58 AM   #10
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
powerhour24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,057
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Sex yes, and other people's addiction, if we're talking in the vein of what U2's done that's fine, I'm sorry but just seeing at face value a post saying U2 need more sex and drugs... that's the dead dinosaur rock star that we never had to see U2 become, and I hope we don't.


powerhour24 is offline  
Old 10-02-2009, 01:59 AM   #11
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
powerhour24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,057
Local Time: 05:17 PM
And yeah more power to Bono for addressing that image problem, shows those people he's not out of touch and he's a human being that doesn't deserve to be decried.


powerhour24 is offline  
Old 10-02-2009, 02:01 AM   #12
Rock n' Roll Doggie
VIP PASS
 
powerhour24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,057
Local Time: 05:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilead12 View Post
What we have to remember with the comment about hits it that U2 really believe in the power of a beautiful melody to rip through the consciousness of entire countries. It's not so much a matter of making a song commercial for them (no songs about chasing hot girls or getting high) as it is finding that melody that's just instantly unforgettable.

The intro to WOWY, the drums/guitar as SBS builds, the piano/guitar on BD... you hear that and you just KNOW it's major.

NLOTH had plenty of beautiful songs, but none of them had that instant classic feel. I'm not even saying it lacked U2 classics (heck, I think MOS, Magnificent, and arguably Breathe/UC/NLOTH/CT are all right there).

What the band means, I think, is not that they're going to go into the studio and scrap beautiful music until they have something that's pure pop. They just mean they want at least one of those songs that you never forget, one of those songs that becomes, by way of the pop consciousness, practically eternal.

U2 believe in an "If you build it, they will come" ethic. They really believe that if they can just find the right melody, the right beautiful chorus, the right sound, the whole world will sit up and listen.

So I don't let it worry me too much. These guys know what good music sounds like.
I truly want to believe you're 115% right!


powerhour24 is offline  
Old 10-02-2009, 02:03 AM   #13
the new sad punk??
Premium Gold Member
 
coolian2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NZAA/AKL
Posts: 34,289
Local Time: 10:17 AM
i swear to god.


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by KhanadaRhodes View Post
it's a nomination to be honoured
i like a lot of bad music
coolian2 is offline  
Old 10-02-2009, 03:58 AM   #14
Refugee
 
Tyagu_Anaykus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Wanderer
Posts: 1,928
Local Time: 09:17 PM
I love satan


Tyagu_Anaykus is online now  
Old 10-02-2009, 07:01 AM   #15
ONE
love, blood, life
 
mikal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Fez
Posts: 13,420
Local Time: 04:17 PM
does anyone else here hate the album "Songs Of Ascent" so far? i just really don't like it at all.


mikal is online now  
Closed Thread

Tags
songs of ascent

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[rumor]next album: 'songs of ascent' Babyface_Mullen Where The Album Has No Name 6 03-03-2009 10:32 PM
Desert Island 3 Master List Screwtape2 Lemonade Stand Archive 334 08-16-2007 08:17 PM
Live Fav Songs Part 2 J_NP Everything You Know Is Wrong Archive 2 07-07-2006 06:12 PM
Bono was wrong! xrayjohn General Tour Discussions 26 05-23-2005 04:34 AM
Images in U2 songs (relating U2 to schoolwork part 2) SkeeK Everything You Know Is Wrong Archive 86 11-16-2001 11:26 PM



Interference.com on Facebook

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com