U2 360 Boxscore Discussion - Page 6

digitize · 08-14-2009, 10:50 PM

What about Cape Town/Johannesburg? They haven't been visited since PopMart... I wouldn't be surprised if the band decide to revisit them.

Also, in the same spirit, Sarajevo and Tel Aviv.

And regarding Moscow... could U2 perform there without risk of having Polonium-210 slipped into Bono's coffee? I'm not sure how the Russian powers that be would react to a U2 show there.

Moggio · 08-15-2009, 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbrecon72

... and yes we know the stones "were" the biggest draw, but not anymore...

Again, that's incorrect. Considering The Stones' accumulative album sales and inflation since 2007, the next Stones tour, which is apparently slated for 2010-2011, will gross in the neighborhood of $700 million...if they basically hit the same markets and played basically the same amount of shows they did on their '05-'07 A Bigger Bang Tour (the highest grossing tour of all time, with a gross of $558 million+).

robbrecon72 · 08-15-2009, 05:49 PM

I'm saying u2 are currently the biggest draw in which the 360 tour is out doing a bigger bang tour so far, if the stones do tour when you say they might and gross more thats great for them i really dont care, i'm not a fan of the stones but i like some of their songs. all i'm saying is none of us truely knows what the future holds for either band, it doesnt matter. i respect both u2 and the stones as bands, but i love u2's music and i'm just glad to see that they are really doing well for themselves.

Moggio · 08-15-2009, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbrecon72

I'm saying u2 are currently the biggest draw...

But they're not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbrecon72

if the stones do tour when you say they might and gross more thats great for them i really dont care, i'm not a fan of the stones but i like some of their songs.

Then why make an issue out of it?

hey you · 08-15-2009, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moggio

But they're not.

Then why make an issue out of it?

moggio why in the last 30 years you and the others fans not have buy a copies of stones albums?
you are frustated and so you came here to think to show us your FACTS? ridicoulos.

Native_Son · 08-15-2009, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moggio

But they're not.

Then why make an issue out of it?

i think we all know who is making the 'issue's around here

robbrecon72 · 08-15-2009, 06:10 PM

this will be my last post about your facts on inflation maggio. if you take a bigger bangs $558 million and inflate it currently it will be $610,310,000 not $700 million so please get your facts correct. at the pace the 360 tour is going and considering we are in a recession, and don't tell me it doesn't affect the tour because it does slightly, it will surpass a bigger bangs inflated gross, so there this is over.

hey you · 08-15-2009, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbrecon72

this will be my last post about your facts on inflation maggio. if you take a bigger bangs $558 million and inflate it currently it will be $610,310,000 not $700 million so please get your facts correct. at the pace the 360 tour is going and considering we are in a recession, and don't tell me it doesn't affect the tour because it does slightly, it will surpass a bigger bangs inflated gross, so there this is over.

please stop to talk with that clown.

leave him alone with his facts.

Moggio · 08-15-2009, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbrecon72

this will be my last post about your facts on inflation maggio. if you take a bigger bangs $558 million and inflate it currently it will be $610,310,000 not $700 million so please get your facts correct.

Inflation AND accumulative album sales. Which would put The Stones' next tour gross total in the neighborhood of $700 million, when they tour again in 2010-2011, if they basically hit the same markets and play the same amount of shows they did on their last tour...

Quote:

Originally Posted by robbrecon72

at the pace the 360 tour is going and considering we are in a recession, and don't tell me it doesn't affect the tour because it does slightly, it will surpass a bigger bangs inflated gross, so there this is over.

No it won't, as I've already explicitly gone over a million times. Because we're dealing with inflation AND accumulative album sales...

Moggio · 08-15-2009, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hey you

moggio why in the last 30 years you and the others fans not have buy a copies of stones albums?
you are frustated and so you came here to think to show us your FACTS? ridicoulos.

Do you speak English?

Moggio · 08-15-2009, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hey you

please stop to talk with that clown.

leave him alone with his facts.

Yeah! Let's deny the FACTS! Who needs 'em...

hey you · 08-15-2009, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Moggio

Do you speak English?

i'm not a clown that came in a forum of u2 to talk of rolling stones facts like you.you have need a doctor but very very good doctor.

robbrecon72 · 08-15-2009, 06:33 PM

I am comparing a bigger bang with the 360 tour and the FACT is when the 360 tour is over and u2 plays everywhere they plan on playing and you consider or factor in inflation the 360 tour will out do a bigger bang tour gross to gross and in attendance with less shows.

spookyz · 08-15-2009, 06:33 PM

Didn't you know? The 360° facts don't count because of strategic schedueling.

I haven' read one single post of that guy (Interference and Ukmix), that is not related with "U2 not being a bigger draw than x and y". Moggio, why don't you just.... fuck off and try to get a life? Don't you realise how ridiculous this is?

And now it's your turn:

Since when is posting FACTS ridiculous? The Rolling Stones ARE THE BIGGER DRAW blablabliblubblblabla inflation blubblub strategic schedueling...blablabla

it's getting boring...

robbrecon72 · 08-15-2009, 06:39 PM

here is another FACT even the sticky and sweet tour is out doing a bigger bang tour if madonna played as many shows as the stones did....oh yeah i forgot ...with inflation of course..lol

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
My U2 audio trade list	CTU2fan	All I Want Is U2	1	09-24-2006 07:35 PM
U2 Ipod catalog	JCOSTER	All I Want Is U2	3	01-12-2006 11:06 PM
Tracklisting for a 'complete' U2 compilation	BizzaD	Everything You Know Is Wrong Archive	11	01-04-2005 04:36 AM
MERGED--> itunes box set is listed.... + Itunes Complete U2 tracklisting here	frenchie1970	Everything You Know Is Wrong Archive	93	11-23-2004 02:37 PM
Something funny with the boys names	Sparkysgrrrl	PLEBA Archive	73	11-03-2002 02:21 PM

08-14-2009, 10:50 PM	#76
digitize Rock n' Roll Doggie ALL ACCESS Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Doing His Disappearing Act (actual: Austin, Texas) Posts: 7,042 Local Time: 10:13 AM	What about Cape Town/Johannesburg? They haven't been visited since PopMart... I wouldn't be surprised if the band decide to revisit them. Also, in the same spirit, Sarajevo and Tel Aviv. And regarding Moscow... could U2 perform there without risk of having Polonium-210 slipped into Bono's coffee? I'm not sure how the Russian powers that be would react to a U2 show there.

08-15-2009, 05:49 PM	#78
robbrecon72 The Fly Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 170 Local Time: 09:13 AM	I'm saying u2 are currently the biggest draw in which the 360 tour is out doing a bigger bang tour so far, if the stones do tour when you say they might and gross more thats great for them i really dont care, i'm not a fan of the stones but i like some of their songs. all i'm saying is none of us truely knows what the future holds for either band, it doesnt matter. i respect both u2 and the stones as bands, but i love u2's music and i'm just glad to see that they are really doing well for themselves.

08-15-2009, 06:10 PM	#82
robbrecon72 The Fly Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 170 Local Time: 09:13 AM	this will be my last post about your facts on inflation maggio. if you take a bigger bangs $558 million and inflate it currently it will be $610,310,000 not $700 million so please get your facts correct. at the pace the 360 tour is going and considering we are in a recession, and don't tell me it doesn't affect the tour because it does slightly, it will surpass a bigger bangs inflated gross, so there this is over.

08-15-2009, 06:33 PM	#88
robbrecon72 The Fly Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 170 Local Time: 09:13 AM	I am comparing a bigger bang with the 360 tour and the FACT is when the 360 tour is over and u2 plays everywhere they plan on playing and you consider or factor in inflation the 360 tour will out do a bigger bang tour gross to gross and in attendance with less shows.

08-15-2009, 06:33 PM	#89
spookyz Babyface Join Date: May 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 10 Local Time: 05:13 PM	Didn't you know? The 360° facts don't count because of strategic schedueling. I haven' read one single post of that guy (Interference and Ukmix), that is not related with "U2 not being a bigger draw than x and y". Moggio, why don't you just.... fuck off and try to get a life? Don't you realise how ridiculous this is? And now it's your turn: Since when is posting FACTS ridiculous? The Rolling Stones ARE THE BIGGER DRAW blablabliblubblblabla inflation blubblub strategic schedueling...blablabla it's getting boring...

08-15-2009, 06:39 PM	#90
robbrecon72 The Fly Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 170 Local Time: 09:13 AM	here is another FACT even the sticky and sweet tour is out doing a bigger bang tour if madonna played as many shows as the stones did....oh yeah i forgot ...with inflation of course..lol